Critique of the Doctrine of Reincarnation with Rational and Scriptural Evidence
Samsara (the cycle of reincarnation) is the central mechanism through which Hinduism justifies the law of karma, and Moksha is considered the only means of escape from it. However, the Islamic intellectual tradition deconstructs this metaphysical cycle from its philosophical foundation.
Prominent Muslim scholars, such as Imam Ibn Hazm in his encyclopedic work and the philosopher Ibn Sina, addressed the idea of reincarnation using rigorous rational arguments.
Ibn Sina demonstrated the impossibility of reincarnation by establishing that every physical body, when it is created, necessarily requires a specific soul that corresponds to it and comes into existence alongside its biological formation.
It is therefore impossible for one soul to move between multiple bodies without causing a fundamental contradiction in the essential identity of the human being.
He further pointed out that reincarnation contradicts self-evident rational principles and leads to an absurd conclusion: that a single individual would simultaneously be multiple distinct individuals if the same soul were transferred across different bodies.
“[For such is the state of the disbelievers] until, when death comes to one of them, he says, "My Lord, send me back,That I might do righteousness in that which I left behind."[1] No! It is only a word he is saying; and behind them is a barrier until the Day they are resurrected.(Surah Al-Mu’minun, 23:99–100)